A history of the morris family
Morris games are genuinely ancient, and the internet is full of confident dates for them that the evidence does not support. Here is what is documented, what is disputed, and where the Indian tradition fits.
The 3,000-year claim, and why it is disputed
Almost every article about this game opens by saying it is over 3,000 years old, on the strength of boards cut into the roofing slabs of the temple at Kurna in Egypt. R. C. Bell assumed a date of around 1400 BCE for them.
That dating does not hold up. Friedrich Berger pointed out that some of the Kurna diagrams include Coptic crosses — a Christian symbol, far later than 1400 BCE — and concluded that "certainly they cannot be dated".
So the honest position is that the Kurna boards are undated, and the confident 1400 BCE figure repeated across the web rests on an assumption its own field has since questioned. The game is old; that particular number is not evidence.
One detail of the Kurna boards is still worth noting for players of this variant: they are described as including diagonal lines.
What the Roman record shows
Firmer ground begins with Rome. One of the earliest textual mentions may be in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria, written around 8 CE, which describes a game of three-in-a-row on a small board.
The physical evidence is broader: morris boards are scratched into stonework across Roman buildings in enough places that Berger considered the game "probably well known by the Romans". Boards cut into public stone are a good sign of a game played casually and often, rather than ceremonially.
Medieval England, and boards in church
The game peaked in popularity in medieval England, and the evidence for it is charming: boards carved into the cloister seats of cathedrals at Canterbury, Gloucester, Norwich, Salisbury and Westminster Abbey — cut by people with time to fill in places where they were meant to be doing something else.
Some of those medieval boards use holes rather than lines for the points, and on at least some of them a diagonal row did not win. The rules were never uniform, which is worth remembering whenever anyone claims a single correct version.
The Indian tradition
In India the game is old, widespread, and known by a different name in almost every language. Indian sources describe play from as early as the 4th century BCE, with the game appearing in records from the Maurya and Gupta periods, and treat it as a pastime of scholars, soldiers and royalty alike.
The physical record continues into the recent past. A board is cut into the floor of a roughly 400-year-old Hanuman temple at Kuluru, in the Nandyal district of Andhra Pradesh — the same habit as the Roman stonework and the English cloisters, repeated on another continent.
| Name | Language or region |
|---|---|
| Navakankari | Sanskrit — “nine pebbles” |
| Navkakri | Gujarati |
| Daadi (also Dahdi) | Telugu; widely used across India |
| Saalu Mane Ata, Jodpi Ata, Char-Par | Kannada |
| Nau Goti | Hindi — “nine pieces” |
| Tigadi | Hindi — from तिगड़ी, a trio |
The traditional Indian game as documented is the board without diagonals: three squares joined at the midpoints, diagonal alignments not counting, and a blocked player losing. The version on this site keeps the family and changes those specifics, which is why it goes by the name of the formation rather than claiming to be Navakankari itself.
What the names tell you
In English alone the game answers to nine-man morris, mill, mills, merels, merrills, merelles, marelles, morelles and ninepenny marl — and, in North America, cowboy checkers. Add the Indian names and the European ones and you have a game that has been reinvented and renamed everywhere it has travelled.
That is the real historical claim worth making. Not a precise date, which nobody has, but a spread: a game simple enough to scratch into any flat surface, and good enough that people in Rome, medieval England and Andhra Pradesh all bothered to.